The Huffington Post UK. People reacted to Bible scripture presented as the Quran. SEE ALSO: #YouAintNoMuslimBruv Becomes Very British Response To Leytonstone.
Chart showing some of the central differences the core teachings of the Bible and Quran. Differences between the Bible and the Qur'an. About Science; About. The central issue is this: do the Bible and the Quran. There are many facets to the Bible vs. Quran debate on the differences. However, by examining the Quran, we are faced by many statements that go against the undisputed facts of science. Islam and Christianity agree that Jesus miraculously was born of a virgin.
![Bible Vs Quran Truth Bible Vs Quran Truth](https://image.slidesharecdn.com/biblequranscience-111019081152-phpapp02/95/bible-quran-and-science-16-728.jpg?cb=1319011983)
THE BIBLE VS THE QURAN (KORAN)THE BIBLE. AND THE QUR'AN, cont.
AN. HISTORICAL COMPARISONBY JAY, A. WEBSITE STUDYhttp: //debate. Abraham. 1. 70. 0=Joseph, 1. Moses, 1. 00. 0=David): What has become. Qur'anic evidence, the most fruitful area for a confirmation of.
Bible's reliability has come from the field of archaeology, for it is. Because Abraham. is honoured by both Christianity and Islam it is interesting to look at. What we find is that archaeology clearly. Abraham in Palestine and not in Arabia. He had just. finished warring in Palestine and inscribed on the walls of his temple at. Karnak the name of the great patriarch, proving that even at this early. Abraham was known not in Arabia, as Muslims contend, but in.
Palestine, the land the Bible places him. There is. further archaeology evidence which supports other Biblical accounts, such. The doors of Sodom (Tell Beit Mirsim) dated to between 2. B. C. Yet, if this account had been written between 9. B. C., as the. critics previously claimed, we would have read about arches and curtains.
An. earlier account would have been cheaper, while a later account would have. Is this mere coincidence? Yet. according to the laws of physics, walls of towns always fall inwards! A. later redactor would certainly have not made such an obvious mistake. Joshua was. Historians had assumed these were simply legendary. R. A. S. Macalister, J. G. Duncan, and. Kathleen Kenyon on Ophel now have found these very water shafts.
![Quran Vs Bible Comparison Quran Vs Bible Comparison](https://s-media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com/736x/ed/75/3a/ed753a23ff5bcc845c5192e6d44025b3.jpg)
Another new and. exciting archaeological research is that which has been carried out by the. British Egyptologist, David Rohl.
Until a few years ago we only had. Patriarchal, Davidic and New Testament. Mosaic period. Yet one would expect. David Rohl (in A Test of Time) has given us a possible. It seems that we have simply been off. By redating the Pharonic lists in Egypt. Israelite. slaves (called Avaris), the death pits from the tenth plague, and Joseph's.
There remain many 'tells' yet to uncover. It is to Luke, however, that the skeptics have. Yet. surprisingly, once the dust had settled on new inscription findings, it is. Luke who has confounded these same critics time and again.
For instance. Luke's use of the word Meris to maintain that Philippi was a . This fact alone. they said, proved that the writer of Acts wrote his account much later as. Gallio's true position. It was only recently that the.
Delphi Inscription, dated to 5. A. D. This inscription. Yet Gallio only held this position for one year. Thus the writer. of Acts had to have written this verse in or around 5.
Torah Vs Quran Vs Bible
A. D., and not. later, otherwise he would not have known Gallio was a proconsul. Suddenly. this supposed error not only gives credibility to the historicity of the.
Acts account, but also dates the writings in and around 5. A. D. Had the. writer written the book of Acts in the 2nd century as many liberal. Pliny and both would have been. Delphi Inscription. It is because. of discoveries such as this that F.
F. Bruce states, . Thus it is because Luke. New Testament can be held in high. We have no. reason to fear archaeology. In fact it is this very science which has done. Thus we encourage the.
Bible has the right to claim. Word of God. This is why. Biblical. accounts. Listen to what they say (taken from Mc. Dowell's Evidences. G. E. Wright. states. Discovery after discovery has established the.
Bible as a source of history. Nelson Glueck. (a Jewish Reformed scholar and archaeologist) probably gives us the. Bible when he states.